« Spring is sprung ... | Main | Iron and Steel »
May 04, 2007
Blair's legacy?
OK, I can't resist. I don't like David Cameron, primarily because, like Blair, he is not what he seems and worse, he isn't a Conservative. He represents to me the the very worst of the current crop of politicians, lacking in vision, lacking in statesmanship, all spin and no substance. Blair has presided over the biggest expansion of bureaucracy in our history, he has eroded our traditional freedoms on an unprecedented scale and he has sold out to every terrorist currently seeking power. The Iraq war is a shambles because he and his ministers don't have a clue and interfere in military matters constantly, the "War on Terror" is a sham because he has terrorist sympathisers in his own government.
The meltdown in their control of Local Government continues apace and not a minute before time. The Conservatives have lost several tricks here because many of my age group (born between 1943 and 1949) see him as a young upstart who is going to do what our parents generation of politicians did to us in excluding us from the top jobs and positions of power (You're too inexperienced!) and then handed it over our heads to the Blair generation (born from 1950 onwards) We were working when they were smoking pot and strumming guitars - and paying into the pension funds Mister Blair and Mister Brown have now robbed to destruction. Am I glad to see this shower getting a hiding? Yes, but as far as I am concerned it isn't enough yet. I want to see them thrown out and their ideology discredited and destroyed completely. I want to see the voters of the world wake up to the fact that it is the socialist ideology that is destroying our civilisation and our nation. I want the voters to see that our present political system is no different to that operated pre- the Reform Act of 1836 in which the only way to advance in government was to have the patronage of someone above you. That system still operates but it is now the established means of promotion in the Civil Service as well. Promotion is not on merit in politics and it certainly isn't on merit in the Civil Service. It is all down to patronage. The right patron and you're in, regardless of your knowledge of the job or your ability.
The only reason this country prospered under that system before 1836 was that those who exrecised patronage then knew the importance of promoting protege's who did know what they were doing. Blair does not.
What a pity we have to wait another three years before we can throw Labour out of power completely in Westminster. Their losing power in Wales and Scotland is something of a sop, but we still have to endure yet another Scottish MP ruling the English and handing our money to the Scots and Welsh in order to bolster his parties power bases. It is a disgrace and it will not be addressed until the English are free of the overriding control of Labour's foot soldiers from Scottish and Welsh Constituencies. They have their own assembly and their own Parliament they should have no say over the English, just as we have no say over them any longer.
Let us hope that this swing in the voter choice continues - and Labour vanishes from our political landscape.
Posted by The Gray Monk at May 4, 2007 10:56 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mt3.mu.nu/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5009
Comments
I still remember that day – 2nd May 1997. Tony Blair entering 10 Downing Street becoming Britain’s youngest prime minister. It was not only his youthful spirit that invigorated me but the “New Labour Manifesto” filled me with a feeling of exuberant optimism. His close relationship with Bill Clinton seemed to usher a new era of social, economic and political progress.
Tony Blair and George W. Bush can no longer differentiate between policy and rhetoric, as their administrations have become cradles of spin, leading their electorate through a forgettable five years of foreign policy blunders.
The Blair of today is not the Blair of 1999. However the Blair of 1999 did demonstrate a clear foreign policy doctrine that would culminate in the full scale involvement of Britain in Iraq. Blair’s prelude to Iraq was Kosovo.
Kosovo was fought without U.N approval against Slobodan Milosevic. While Milosevic was responsible for slaughtering his own people, he did not pose any threat to any of the major European or NATO powers. The Kosovo bombing campaign was deployed under the NATO flag, although Britain, like the United States in Iraq, committed the largest force. Kosovo was a success. However had it failed, Clinton and Blair would have been regarded as interventionists and imperialists. Kosovo shaped Blair’s doctrine of international community.
Posted by: The Dark One at May 4, 2007 04:18 PM
Good Morning !
In America We have many of the same problems. I am part of a great silent majority, that is often despised, and made light of, in the respect of our traditions, history, and relegion. We have politicians that don't really represent us, only their own apparent future prospects. The war in Iraq drags on, hopefully to a reasonable safe conclusion. Our liberal/leftist politicians are so invested in the political defeat of Pres. Bush, the furthest thing from their mind, is the actual safety of any troops on the ground, both American, or British. They seem to take a perverse delight in the casualty count. Iraq has been a convenient political club, with which to hammer him with. Here, as in Britain, they also take a great delight in giving away money, that is not theirs, on many decades of failed social programs.
This current bunch of politicos, did many of the same things, that Yours did during the sixties, and I think that most of them became lawyers, which of course makes them ideal politicians, used car sales men, or members of an organized crime family. A current movement in our Congress, is a measure to silence our "Talk Radio" commentators, who have been described as "Threats to National Security" . The movement is of course being backed by the most extreme liberal/progressive politicians in the Nation. So much for freedom of speech, and political tolerance, also preached so often by the same liberal elements. So long for now.
Stan Ellefson
Chesapeake, Va., USA
Posted by: Stan Ellefson at May 6, 2007 05:38 AM